Posted by A couple of things have come up on social media recently that forced me to start thinking. Forced me to start thinking about how it is that people fundamentally misunderstand some concepts in volleyball and coaching.
Special offer on webinars here.
The first was this instagram reel promoted as a drill to improve reading. It is obviously not a reading drill, but why is it not obvious to others.
Over 5! hours of presentations from the 1st VfB Friedrichshafen International Coaches Conference
What is reading? Reading is the observation and processing of game cues. Good observation and processing of game cues leads to choosing optimal game outcomes (decision making) and eventually executing them in the service of the team.
So let’s take a moment to review the above drill. Which game cues is the blocker observing? I’ll wait for you to watch again. The correct answer is zero. There is no reception, no setter, no set, no attack. There is zero game information contained in that drill. The blocker must make a choice, yes, but not based on anything that might happen in a game.
That is not to say the drill doesn’t have a place in training, or that it doesn’t have a positive effect on some elements of performance. It cannot however be said that one of those positive effects is in improving reading skills.
On a similar note, a post on a coaching site, I don’t remember which, asked for advice on improving some element of timing in attack. The proferred advice included things such as tape and other objects on the floor, none of which had any relationship to timing. So where does the advice come from?
What is timing? With apologies to Johan Cruyff, good timing is being in the right place at the right time. So what exactly is that place and time? That is a great question. As unsatisfying as it may be, the answer to that question is, it depends. It depends on the movement of the ball and the players on the court. Every situation is unique.
So what happens when we put things on the floor? The first thing we do is look down, ie not at the ball. So right there we know that any such drill cannot be training timing. We can create a drill that might look like it approximates timing under a particular set of circumstances but once reality intrudes we cannot be surprised that the relationship between player and ball no longer holds.
That is not to say the drill doesn’t have a place in training, or that it doesn’t have a positive effect on some elements of performance. It cannot however be said that one of those positive effects is improved timing.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter how creative a coach might be, the only way to improve reading and timing skills is to do things that very closely approximately a game. The coach might simplify situations to teach observation skills and reduce possible options, or provide feedback on eye work (actually they have to do that anyway), or even simplify technique (do you really need a 4 step approach?) but in the end the players actually need to do real reps. And, yes, that takes time. Sometimes a long time, but in some things there are no shortcuts.
At Home On The Court 