Coaching volleyball, or indeed any sport, for a living is tough. It is not only the work that is difficult but it can become all consuming to the extent that it affects your personal and family life, and even your personality. It can change your perspective (a loss is a disaster and a win is merely the postponement of the next disaster). It can change your sense of humour* (if you have sensitive players who take everything personally). It can change your sense of reality (an officiating error against you is proof of cheating, while one your favour is proof of your quality). And it can absolutely affect your sense of irony. As you can imagine, with no perspective, humour or sense of reality, there can be no irony.
Which brings us to the above video. Although I certainly have my lapses, I think that I have done a reasonable job of avoiding the pitfalls described above. The point in the video is from the bronze medal match from the 2015 CEV Champions League. It shows my team (Berlin Recycling Volleys) create a great opportunity to win the match, and then make a ‘simple’, ‘unforced’ error. My reaction is a rueful smile and a silent expletive. The reason for the smile is at that exact moment of time I remembered a moment at training about a week before in which I implored my team (again) to always force the high ball set close to the net and further emphasised my point by saying ‘I would rather make one direct error and nine perfect sets than ten ‘okay’ sets’. I never thought those words would come back to bite us at quite that moment**. Luckily my sense of irony has not yet been destroyed by my lack of perspective.
During the recent World League Finals tournament it became something of a bugbear of the commentator when teams made similar errors in setting high balls. His mantra was that in those situations the player should always set the ball on the 10 feet from the net to be safe. Fair enough, although it could have been the players were trying to set 10 feet from the net but didn’t know where that was. But I digress. My problem was that he did comment that the dozens and dozens of great sets were still not the safe option, just ‘luckily’ not errors. On those occasions he always praised the attacker who made the point and simply didn’t mention the set or setter who made it possible.
There are two important points here.
Firstly, you must be absolutely consistent in your demands of the players. If you demand aggression, you cannot fault errors that result from what you demand. Conversely if you demand conservatism, you should fault aggression, even if it results in a successful action.
Secondly, the key concept that led to the errors that so annoyed the commentator was that the current generation of players / teams / coaches is playing to win. Previous generations’ first instinct was conservative, to play not to lose. Playing to win means searching for solutions that lead directly to points which in turn means that errors can occur. Playing not to lose means searching for solutions that give your opponent the chance to make errors. This leads to what I saw in the 2012 Olympics which was teams who often seemed to be playing ‘with’ each other in a kind of choreographed dance. It can certainly be annoying at times to see a service error at set point or spike aimed at the top joint of the middle blockers finger land untouched in a spectators lap but those errors arise from exactly the kind of thinking that also leads to the countless successful actions that make modern volleyball such an astonishingly spectacular sport. You can’t have one without the other.
*Doing anything in the absence of humour is, not surprisingly, an incredible painful experience.
**To keep perspective, we might have made five such errors over the course of the season and I am almost certain the player in question made only that one, including nine months worth of training and dozens of more difficult ones.